Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of therapeutic effects of radiotherapy during treatment of lung adenocarcinoma in mice with positron emission tomography imaging of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG

Baolin Qu1, Hui Wang2, Wei Yu1, Jinming Zhang2, Huijuan Zhang1, Jiahe Tian2

1Department of Radiation Oncology; 2Department of Nuclear Medicine of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

For correspondence:-  Jiahe Tian   Email: jiahetianjf@sina.com   Tel:+86942648412

Received: 10 March 2015        Accepted: 10 June 2015        Published: 29 July 2015

Citation: Qu B, Wang H, Yu W, Zhang J, Zhang H, Tian J. Evaluation of therapeutic effects of radiotherapy during treatment of lung adenocarcinoma in mice with positron emission tomography imaging of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG. Trop J Pharm Res 2015; 14(7):1293-1298 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i7.24

© 2015 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the role of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluoro-thymidine (18F-FLT) and 2'-deoxy-2'-18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (18F-FDG)  positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in the evaluation of the therapeutic effects of radiotherapy during treatment of lung adenocarcinoma.
Methods: Eighteen mice with lung adenocarcinoma were randomly divided into 2 groups; each group was randomly paired and evenly divided into three smaller groups, namely, A, B and C. Group A served as the control group without any treatment; mice in group B were received radiotherapy in sites of tumor. A single dose of 2000 cGy, 6MV x-ray was used in this experiment; mice in group C also received radiotherapy at sites of tumors two days before the experiment using the same procedure and dose as group B. Micro PET imaging was taken after intravenous injection of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG through the mice’s tail.
Results: The intake ratio of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG was much higher at the tumor sites. After radiotherapy, 18F-FLT uptake was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.05), while there was no obvious change of 18F-FDG uptake. There was a significant decrease in T/NT value of FLT PET imaging group 24 and 48 h after radiotherapy; a significant difference could be seen, compared with that before radiotherapy (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Change in 18F-FLT uptake induced by radiotherapy is more sensitive than that of 18F-FDG. Intake of 18F-FLT is lowered more significantly after radiotherapy than that of 18F-FDG, and this can serve as evidence that 18F-FLT is an effective tracer to monitor the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy on malignant tumors.

Keywords: 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluoro-thymidine, 2'-deoxy-2'-18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose, Radiotherapy, Positron Emission Tomography imaging, Cell proliferation, Lung a

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates